![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NGC 3628
Click here for a 1/2 resolution view, 1.6 MB. Click here for a full resolution view, 7.3 MB.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image Information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thanks to Paul Mortfield for pointing out that there are a number of quasars behind NGC 3628. The circle outlines the more distant quasar in the FOV. It has a redshift of 2.15. Others can be found here. Thanks to Fred Ringwald for providing interesting details as to "how far away" a redshift of 2.15 actually is. Fred's comments are as follows, "I just did the calculation, and I find that a redshift of z = 2.15 corresponds to seeing the object the way it was 10.6 billion years ago, which was during the first 3.1 billion years of the age of the Universe. This corresponds to a distance of 18.1 billion light-years. Notice that at such great distances, a light-travel time of 10.6 billion years doesn't imply a distance of 10.6 billion light-years, because the Universe has expanded significantly since the light left the quasar. There's also the non-zero cosmological constant to deal with. A nice primer for how to do calculations like this is here." Thanks Paul, thanks Fred for pointing out some interesting science in this image. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
www.sierra-remote.com www.sierraremoteobservatories.com |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||